A Social Constructionist Perspective On The Diffusion Of Innovative Fiscal Responsibility Legislation
Author: JOE WALLIS and SHAUN GOLDFINCH
Published in PFM, Vol. 13 No. 1
Compared to competitive, coercive and learning models, social constructionist theory is particularly well-suited to explaining the diffusion of policy norms across cross-country net-works. This paper augments this approach with a myth perspective that is applied to an analy-sis of the diffusion of the qualitative fiscal norms embedded in New Zealand’s innovative Fis-cal Responsibility Act of 1994. The ‘prime mover’, ‘innovative discontinuity’ and ‘unmodified legislative success’ components of the agent significance myth surrounding this fiscal respon-sibility law (FRL) are examined and the scope and limits of its subsequent diffusion are re-lated to mutual identification and interaction across pre-established network linkages between actors who have learnt its usefulness. The relative durability of myths compared to fads lend an unpredictability to the diffusion process, the potential limits of which are shaped by cul-tural and institutional factors that influence the receptiveness of governments to such norm-based approaches to fiscal discipline.
Subscribers: Login to read this article
Guests: Subscribe to PFM, or purchase individual article access for $10.
The article is not available for automatic download. We will email the article to you as a PDF file upon receiving your payment, typically within 24 hours.